Updates on new and changing regulations plus best practice in health, safety, quality and environment

Occupational Hygiene Provider fined by HSE

We offer a range of services which are classed as occupational hygiene.  This term is not often used and is often misunderstood even by those who are working to improve the health and safety of workers.  This is the reason that these safety professionals rely on outside competent help to assist them when it comes to chemical exposures and monitoring the effectiveness of their controls from spray booths to simple PPE.Occupational Hygiene

We have, without fail, only met other providers who are professional and serious about their role in assisting others but there will be occasions where gaps are found and mistakes are made.  We feel sure that the business named below has high standards but it did fail in this case.

The learning point is to develop a good understanding of what you require and to work repeatedly with a provider who you know and trust to carry out your Occupational Hygiene programme.  Interpretation of the data is key and there can be times when the knowledge of the onsite staff working within the business is the key determining factor in getting the job done right.  We have often visited workplaces where isocyanate exposures are poorly understood and data is scant, often being limited to a simple yes/ no rating of OK or not OK.  Delving a little deeper allows you to gain knowledge which can be very helpful but will require more time and effort on the part of all concerned.

An example would be providing enough data so that a client can be updated if an exposure is higher than the last sample, is this trending upwards?  If so what might be the cause of this?  Higher throughput?  A change in supplier perhaps?  Maintenance issues with the control from LEV or similar?  Changes in the air supply such as ‘dirty air’ feeding back into the compressors providing ‘breathing air’?

When all is said and done we are all here to ensure the safety of these workers and must work together to achieve this goal.  If you have occupational exposure monitoring or biological monitoring in place make sure you have sufficient understanding of it to interpret the basics of what you are being supplied with.  Ask for the results and a brief explanation of them.  Speak to the person onsite carrying out the work and see if they can explain what they are doing and why, and then ask them why they are not sampling other areas or personnel.  In short, be satisfied that you have the right people doing the job as far as you can and take an interest in this more technical assessment of safety in your workplace, you might find it as interesting as we do! 

If you would like to know more about occupational hygiene, solvent exposure sampling, welding fume exposure monitoring, metal powder exposure for additive manufacture or wood dust exposure in your workshops (plus perhaps a hundred other exposures) please get in touch or ask us to call you back.


HSE Press Release

A Hampshire-based hygiene consultancy firm has been fined £2,000 after its failures put workers at risk of exposure to hazardous substances.

Envirochem Analytical Laboratories Limited provided an occupational hygiene consultancy service to customers across the South of England. The reports provided by Envirochem are used by their customers to make decisions regarding necessary controls to protect their workforce from risks to their health from substances including hazardous chemicals and dusts. However, they provided one customer with a deficient occupational hygiene exposure monitoring report.

An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found the report to be inadequate and did not provide the information necessary regarding the extent of exposure to hazardous substances, including isocyanates from paint spraying, a potent respiratory sensitiser. The report used inappropriate occupational hygiene monitoring and analysis methods and consequently under-reported the actual exposures at the customers premises.

Portsmouth Magistrates Court heard the services the company provided included the provision of reports, following testing carried out by their consultants at customer premises.

Envirochem Analytical Laboratories Limited, of The Gardens, Broadcut, Fareham, Hampshire, pleaded guilty to breaching Section 3(1) of The Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. The company was fined £2,000 and ordered to pay £6,583 in costs at Portsmouth Magistrates’ Court on 23 May 2023.

HSE inspector Nicola Pinckney said: “This was a case of the company failing to provide the specialist services which its customer expected. Consultancies providing specialist services have a responsibility to ensure they are competent to undertake this type of work, undertake the work to the correct standards and provide accurate reports. They need to provide the necessary information, instruction, training and supervision to their employees undertaking this work to enable them to provide this specialist service.

“I would urge those wanting to appoint occupational hygiene specialists to check with the relevant professional body, such as the British Occupational Hygiene Society, as to whether those offering consultancy services are competent to do so.”

Hampshire hygiene consultancy firm fined after admitting failures

Posted by Roger Hart

LPG forklift truck fire risk – HSE Safety Notice Issued on LPG forklift truck fires

Many of our customers will have forklifts trucks operating at their premises and a good number of these will be of the LPG type.  You may well not be aware of the potential for LPG forklift truck fires.  Apart from one obvious danger, the emission of carbon monoxide (an LPG engine will typically give rise to one-quarter as much CO as a petrol equivalent) these forklifts are a sound choice.  However, recently HSE has noticed a number of accidents which have led to LPG forklift truck fires. If you operate forklift trucks fueled by LPG you should read on to find out more and to decide if you are affected by the hazards highlighted below.LPG forklift truck fires

If you have questions surrounding the potential for LPG forklift truck fires then please contact us if you are part of our Safety~net competent person scheme or if you wish to become part of it call us or we will call you back.


Health and Safety Executive – Safety notice: LPG forklift truck fires

Department name: Engagement and Policy Division (EPD)

Bulletin number: EPD02-2023

Issue date: 05/23

Target audience: Anyone responsible operating, supplying, inspecting or maintaining LPG powered forklift trucks.

Issue

HSE is aware of a number of fires on, and around, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) powered forklift trucks and other similar vehicles that have occurred during starting.

Outline of the problem

Build-up of deposits in fuel systems, in particular, the vaporiser units of LPG powered vehicles has led to a number of fires.

Trucks not starting due to sticking valves

Deposits in vaporiser units, flow regulators and shut off valves cause the truck to fail to start, particularly from cold. Build-up of deposits can lead to sticking valves and the mixture supplied to the engine being too rich to be ignited.

Repeated starting attempts can release unburned LPG

Repeated starting attempts can result in the release of unburned LPG, which in extreme cases can be ignited, setting fire to the vehicle and surrounding materials and causing LPG forklift truck fires.

Action required

Operators

  • review your safe system of work in relation to the use of all LPG powered lift trucks and similar vehicles
  • provide information, instruction and training for all operators about the hazards raised in this alert
  • park LPG vehicles in well ventilated areas free from flammable material, particularly when parking overnight or for longer periods

If a truck does not start within the normal few seconds

  • do NOT continue to turn (crank) the engine over using the starter
  • do NOT repeat the normal engine starting procedure
  • do NOT spray volatile agents into the air intake in an attempt to aid starting
  • get off the truck and close the shut off valve to isolate the gas bottle
  • secure the truck to prevent further starting attempts
  • ensure the area is well ventilated
  • do NOT attempt to solve or repair the problem yourself, arrange for a competent maintenance engineer to do a check of the LPG system

Service and maintenance engineers

If you are presented with an LPG powered truck with a starting problem:

  • do NOT follow the normal starting procedure
  • isolate the LPG supply by closing the shut off valve
  • ensure that the area is well ventilated
  • disconnect the battery
  • release LPG pressure trapped in the fuel supply system
  • follow the manufacturer’s guidance for inspection of the LPG system

LPG is cold, take appropriate precautions when working with it. Once released LP gas is heavier than air and can pool in low-lying areas, where it can be ignited by any source of ignition, including static electricity, electrical sparks and hot surfaces leading to LPG forklift truck fires.

Guidance

Relevant legal documents

Posted by Roger Hart

Wood Dust Inspections from HSE are underway

HSE inspectors are visiting businesses across Great Britain in woodworking industries, focusing on the dangers of respiratory risks from wood dust.

The inspections are to ensure duty holders know the established health risks associated with woodworking and have effective controls in place to keep workers safe and protect their respiratory health.wood dust

In 2022/23, HSE found 78% of businesses were not compliant in protecting workers from wood dust and other respiratory hazards. This resulted in 402 enforcement actions being taken.

We’ve monitored for soft and hardwood dust exposures for over 25 years now, carrying out dust monitoring in various workshops and factories across the country.  We think it’s unlikely you’ll be aware that hardwood dust levels have reduced in line with a European Directive (the EU Carcinogen and Mutagens Directive (2017/2398).  In compliance with the EU Directive, the limit in Great Britain has fallen from the previous level of 5 mg/m3 (as an 8-hour time-weighted average or TWA) for hardwood dust to 3 mg/m3 in 2020 and then to 2 mg/m3 in 2023.  (Note: this is applicable to hardwood rather than softwood dust but where exposures are mixed, as is common in the industry, then the lower limit will apply).

Note: for any clients who are affected by this change please speak directly to Roger Hart on 01453 800100 to discuss the requirements, similarly, if you’re a new client and need some support on wood dust please either call or request a callback

To ensure your woodworking business is managing the risks and is prepared for an HSE inspection, HSE have produced free resources and guidance to prevent exposure to dust and protect your workers’ respiratory health:  

You can get further information about the campaign through the HSE’s press release..

Posted by Roger Hart

To do: Metalworking fluids – making sure you have protected your staff

HSE has recently released metal working fluid guidance in association with the United Kingdom Lubricants Association.  Metalworking fluids provide a home for bacteria to breed and skin contact and inhalation of these fluids can lead to serious, but preventable, diseases for your staff.

The good practices which can prevent these occupational diseases are relatively simple and these good practices are summarised in a series of video guides which are now available.

See the details of the release below to find out more.  If you have questions on the subject and are a member of our Safety~net competent person scheme please get in touch with us using the links below for more information including the details of a metalworking fluid monitoring service which can carry out all of these checks on your behalf.  If you would like to assess personal exposure to metal working fluids then we can offer this service through our occupational hygienists, again, please get in touch to find out more.


Practical videos on carrying out fluid quality checks on metalworking fluids released

Exposure to metalworking fluids can cause serious lung disease, so it is really important that the right control measures and fluid quality checks are in place.

The United Kingdom Lubricants Association Metalworking Fluid Product Stewardship Group, in partnership with HSE and the University of Sheffield Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre, have produced 10 short stand-alone videos.

The videos are to support and encourage greater compliance in the safe management of metalworking fluids. 

The videos, aimed at workshop owners and managers, health & safety representatives, workshop supervisors, machine operators and trainee operators, include:  

  • easy to follow demonstrations of the quick and simple tests that should be carried out 
  • advice on effective storage and mixing of metalworking fluids 
  • information on protecting the health of workers and assets  

HSE’s website also has guidance on managing fluid quality.  

Posted by Roger Hart

Frequency of Electrical Installation Condition Reports (EICR Reports)

EICRAn Electrical Installation Condition Report (EICR) is an inspection by a trained and competent electrical engineer to look at the fabric of the electrical installation, something which typically remains unseen.  All electrical installations will deteriorate over time, cables can become damaged and fittings can become loose or damaged.

Similarly, the design of the system itself may be out of sync with current requirements if new equipment has been added to the building. BS 7671, Regulation 135.1 recommends that every electrical installation is subject to periodic inspection and testing.

However, it should be noted that, as stated in the introduction to BS 7671, existing installations that have been constructed in accordance with earlier editions of the Standard may not comply with the current edition in every respect, but this does not
necessarily mean that they are unsafe for continued use or require upgrading.

In older buildings you might find:

  • Fixed cables coated in black rubber (stopped being used in the 1960s).
  • Fixed cables coated in lead or fabric (used before the 1960s).
  • A fuse box with a wooden back, cast iron switches, or a mixture of fuse boxes (used before the 1960s).
  • Older round pin sockets (or light switches), braided flex hanging from ceiling roses, brown (or black) switches, or sockets mounted in or no skirting boards (used before the 1960s).
  • Light switches on the walls or in bathrooms (used before the 1960s).

In terms of who you use to complete this work the person would need electrical competent and is almost always an NICEIC, NAPIT or ELECSA registered provider, they will be looking to:

  1. Record the results of the inspection and testing to make sure the electrical installation is safe to be used until the next inspection (following any work needed to make it safe)
  2. Find any damage and wear and tear that might affect safety, and report it
  3. Find any parts of the electrical installation that do not meet the IET Wiring Regulations
  4. Help find anything that may cause electric shocks and high temperatures
  5. Provide an EICR record of the installation at the time of the inspection and for inspection testing in the future.

The table below provides guidance on the frequency of formal EICR inspections of electrical installations and routine EICR checks. (Table extracted from BS7671 IET Wiring Regulations 18th Edition: 2018).

Type of InstallationRoutine checkMaximum period between EICR
inspections and testing
as necessary
General Installation
Domestic accommodation –
general
Domestic accommodation –
rented houses and flats

1 year

change of occupancy/10 years
change of occupancy/5 years
Residential accommodation (Houses of
Multiple Occupation) – halls of residence,
nurse accommodation, etc.
1 yearchange of occupancy/5 years
Educational establishments6 months5 years
Industrial1 year3 years
Commercial1 yearChange of occupancy/5 years
Offices1 year5 years
Shops1 year5 years
Laboratories1 year5 years
Hospitals and Clinics
Hospitals and medical clinics –
general areas
Hospitals and medical clinics –
medical locations
1 year

6 months

5 years

1 year

Buildings open to the public
Cinemas1 year1-3 years
Church installations1 year5 years
Leisure complexes
(excluding swimming pools)
1 year3 years
Places of public entertainment1 year3 years
Restaurants and hotels1 year5 years
Theatres1 year3 years
Public houses1 year5 years
Village halls/Community centres1 year5 years
Special and specific installations
(for medical locations see above)
Agricultural and horticultural1 year3 years
Swimming pools4 months1 year
Caravans
Caravan parks
1 year
6 months
3 years
1 year
Highway power suppliesas convenient6-8 years
Marinas4 months1 year
Fish farms4 months1 year
Emergency lightingdaily/monthly3 years
Fire alarmsdaily/weekly1 year
Launderettesmonthly1 year
Petrol filling stations1 year1 year
Construction site installations3 months3 months
Posted by Roger Hart

HAVS, Noise and battery powered tools – HSE research issued

The Health and Safety Executive recently produced a short video after completing research on whether the presence of more and more battery-powered tools in the workplace has meant that overall exposure to noise and vibration (HAVS) is reduced due to these new tools being used.HAVS Noise exposure

A common sense ponder on this might well lead you to the conclusion that battery-powered tools would be lower in both noise and vibration (HAVS) as common sense would surely dictate that the power available to a battery versus a 110/240 volt powered tool or an air tool would be quite different. However, the advances in both battery and motor technology have meant that these battery-powered tools are surprisingly powerful, particularly in their most modern forms.

A short video here (HSE Video) gives the simple answer from HSE, some are indeed lower than their traditionally powered counterparts but some are above the levels seen for more traditional tools.  Add to this the weight of the battery power pack and you have a further aspect to consider with ergonomics, particularly for extended periods of use.

Our advice is to treat all tools as potential sources of HAVS exposure and remember, manufacturer’s data on vibration provide a useful comparative figure but will not reflect the true exposure of your staff.  USE resources such as the HSE’s own vibration data available here: https://www.hse.gov.uk/vibration/hav/source-vibration-magnitude-app3.pdf and the data from reputable data sources such as this database: https://www.thetooladvisor.com/

Finally, don’t be afraid to ask for some help.  We have some innovative methods and some very useful equipment which can help you determine what your exposures are.  This isn’t an easy area in which to complete accurate assessments and gathering enough of the right data is key, contact us for further info or request a call back to speak to a consultant.

Please find some more information in the articles below from our blog:

Hand Arm Vibration: Competency for HAVS Health Surveillance

Hand arm vibration syndrome (HAVS) – are you really managing the risk?

£600,000 Fine for Property Developer over HAVS risk assessment

Posted by Roger Hart

Updates to PPE Regulations and UKCA / CE Marking requirements

The Health and Safety Executive has recently issued new guidance covering when you will have to specify equipment which is certified to the new UKCA (UK Certification Authority) PPE standards.  This change allows CE-marked equipment to continue to be specified and put in use as PPE until 1 January 2025.  There are also two important exemptions which will continue to apply after this date:PPE UKCA

  • Qualifying Northern Ireland goods can continue to be placed on the GB market bearing the CE marking or CE and UKNI markings after 1 January 2025;
  • CE-marked PPE that was placed on the UK or EU markets before 1 January 2025 (before the expiry of the Transition Period) and has not yet reached its end user may continue to circulate on either market until it reaches them and UKCA applies

As it stands all buyers will need to ensure that new PPE meets the UKCA standard after 01/01/2025 but please be aware that PPE that is CE-marked, and was placed on the market on or before 31 December 2024, can continue to be used, providing that it is otherwise suitable.

HSE has further guidance on both the above transitions and the choices of PPE in general on its website here: https://www.hse.gov.uk/ppe/product-safety-and-supply.htm

You can find further information on our blog as regards PPE at the following links:

Changes to PPE Regulations are on their way

PPE: Can staff bring in their own?

 

Posted by Roger Hart

When does FFI not apply

HSEWe thought it might be useful for our clients to know of instances where HSE Fee For Intervention does not apply.  Careful reading will see some contradiction with the recent instance of an individual being served an FFI notice. (updated January 2023, first publication 2013)

Application of FFI and exemptions

FFI is applied by HSE to dutyholders including employers, self-employed people who put others at risk, and some individuals acting in a capacity other than as an
employee (eg individual partners and, potentially in construction, domestic clients), where HSE is the enforcing authority for the HSW Act, including:

  • public and limited companies;
  • general, limited and limited liability partnerships;
  • Crown and public bodies.

FFI does not apply to work where:

  • another fee is payable or has been paid for the purpose of health and safety regulation, eg COMAH;
  • the material breach relates only to laws that are not relevant statutory provisions as defined in the HSW Act;
  • the enforcing authority is not HSE, eg local authorities.

Fees are not payable under the FFI scheme:

  • by individuals acting in their capacity as an employee;
  • by individuals who have committed an offence under sections 36 and/or 37 of the HSW Act; or,
  • by self-employed people who put only themselves at risk;
  • for HSE work in connection with an appeal to an employment tribunal against an Improvement or Prohibition Notice;
  • for prosecutions after an Information has been laid in England and Wales, or after HSE submits a report to the Procurator Fiscal for a decision in Scotland.

How FFI works

HSE’s regulatory work includes inspecting work activities, investigating incidents resulting in death, injury and ill health, following up complaints about poor standards and taking enforcement action. A fee is payable if:

  • a person is or has been contravening relevant health and safety at work law;
  • an inspector is of the opinion that the person is contravening/has contravened the law;
  • the inspector notifies the person in writing of that opinion.

The written notification must include the following information:

  • the statutory provision that the inspector’s opinion relates to;
  • particulars of the reasons for their opinion;
  • notification that a fee is payable to HSE in accordance with the Regulations.

This document is a letter known as a Notification of Contravention. This can be provided in a templated form at the conclusion of a site visit or it can be prepared and sent via post or email.

A Notification of Contravention letter will only be sent when an inspector forms the opinion that the contravention amounts to a material breach – a contravention of health and safety at work law which is sufficiently serious to require notification in writing. ‘Seriousness’ in this context is assessed by considering the principles and factors set out in the HSE’s Enforcement Policy Statement (www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/hse41.pdf) and Enforcement Management Model (www.hse.gov.uk/enforce/emm.pdf)

A Notification of Contravention letter may stand alone or be accompanied by Improvement and/or Prohibition Notices.

The Notification of Contravention letter may also include advice about matters which do not amount to a material breach and/or enforcement on contraventions of health and safety at work law for which FFI does not apply. In either case, costs for writing these elements of the letter will not be recovered from a dutyholder.

The fee will cover HSE’s costs for the time spent identifying the material breach and working with the dutyholder (eg individual, business or organisation) to put it right. Those who are complying with the law will not have to pay FFI.

When deciding whether a dutyholder is in material breach of the law, inspectors must apply this guidance, HSE’s Enforcement Policy Statement and the Enforcement Management Model. Examples of material breaches are outlined in Appendix 1.

HSE will not typically recover its costs under FFI in the following circumstances:

  1. where the material breach relates only to any of the laws listed in Appendix 1 because these laws are not made under the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974;
  2. for HSE’s work in connection with an appeal against an improvement or prohibition notice at an employment tribunal;
  3. for HSE’s work in relation to a prosecution in England and Wales after Information is laid at court – any subsequent prosecution costs will be recovered through the courts (at the courts’ discretion);
  4. for HSE’s work in relation to a prosecution in Scotland after HSE submits a report to the Procurator Fiscal for a decision as to whether a prosecution should be brought. Any subsequent prosecution costs cannot be recovered under Scottish law; and for HSE’s work in relation to Crown bodies from the point where HSE formally notifies the Crown body that it would have begun FFI

If you’ve got questions or need support on safety in the industrial, contracting or construction sectors please contact us for sensible and proportionate advice on 01453 800100

Posted by Roger Hart

Working from Home (WFH) guidance

Working from home has become a norm for many clients with a significant number adopting a hybrid approach post-pandemic of being in and out of the office over a typical working week.  With this in mind, the responsibilities of an employer who has working from home in place are worth exploring again.Working from Home

When the pandemic was upon us the risk assessment expectation for working from home was somewhat different.  HSE were aware that businesses were having to cope with a changing set of regulation, restrictions and guidance in order to keep going and so enforcement was, understandably, a little looser than it might otherwise have been.  Now we are in more stable conditions these expectations will have risen and employers have had a greater opportunity to identify and more fully address their duties.

All of this leads us to the question: what are you doing to risk assess working from home and, is it enough?

Well, the answers are below in our Q&A with some caveats, you can also read through the HSE guidance here: https://www.hse.gov.uk/home-working/employer/risk-assessment.htm and check out some more useful links in the text below.

  • Do I need to visit my staff who are working from home?
    • Not necessarily, no. It would be acceptable in most cases for staff to complete their own DSE assessment.  This would typically be supplemented by a few questions which link to this covering safety of electrical items and similar.  HSE have a useful checklist on which you can base your own surveys or you could simply adopt the HSE version.  Here’s a link to HSE document CK1: https://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/ck1.htm  However, you might want to arrange a visit where you have something other than simply using display screen equipment or where that person has greater and more specific needs in terms of ergonomics due to an injury or condition from which they suffer.
  • What hazards do I need to consider when I have staff working from home?
    • Several things come to mind for any home worker. How you will keep in touch with them, regular Teams meetings or other tools might be useful, including a time when a group of colleagues come together to speak and catch up. This also links across to the more general aspects of well-being.  Also, consider the differences between team members, younger staff may not have the space for a dedicated workspace in their accommodation.  If someone can only work from a sofa and you require 40 hours per week of output from them homeworking may not be the best solution.
  • What responsibility do I have for other hazards which might be present in the home?
    • This is a common question.  The hazards with which you should be concerned centre on the following:
      • Electrical equipment, which you supply. Perhaps overloaded cables, PAT tested items for those you supply;
      • Slips, trips and falls – you can give advice and guidance on this through remote learning and toolbox talks;
      • Emergencies – contact numbers for staff should they need them and what you might do if you could not contact a homeworker;
      • Lone working – linked to the above, regular contact or perhaps a more sophisticated monitoring option if that is within your capabilities;
      • reporting of accidents and incidents – should something occur related to the work being done of the equipment being used then these requirements still apply, all the way up to RIDDOR reportables should they happen.

If you’d like to explore more about this here are some other helpful links from ACAS: https://www.acas.org.uk/working-from-home-and-hybrid-working and from the CIEHF (Chartered Institute of Ergonomics and Human Factors): https://ergonomics.org.uk/static/1c6aa0e1-bbfa-43a0-ad567a98d6bef005/Working-From-Home-Infographic.pdf

There are also some useful videos here that HSE has recommended in the past for use of laptops from Vodafone: https://youtu.be/8Bp_Ury-PA4

 

 

 

Posted by Roger Hart

Workplace temperatures: Is it too hot to work yet?

At this time of the year, we get calls from clients, website visitors and other contacts about the heat and how this links to health and sworking temperaturesafety.  Is it too hot to work is a question that we have answered many times in the past and the truth is that we don’t have a limit set in legislation.

You may be familiar with the lower temperature limits which have been set at 13oC for active workers and 16oC for sedentary (seated) workers but there is no accepted equivalent for higher temperatures.  HSE has even produced a FAQ to cover the questions raised on temperatures here: https://www.hse.gov.uk/temperature/faq.htm  and unions have long campaigned in vain for some limits (typically a max. of 30oC) to be set for office and similar workers: https://www.unison.org.uk/news/article/2019/07/hns-heat/  However, we are still at a position where no higher limit applies.

You may still have questions on this and so at this time (and temperature) you may want to consult HSE’s guidance here: https://www.hse.gov.uk/temperature/index.htm You may even want to set an upper limit in your own workplace if that’s appropriate.  There’s some good guidance on how temperatures affect worker productivity here: https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-news/pages/toohottoocold.aspx but what we can’t do is tell you that one piece of information you really want to hear because there is no limit on an upper temperature in the workplace.

Guidance:  Think about fans, cool drinks, taking a break in a cooler area, staying out of the sun, starting earlier and other good practical solutions.

Staff using PPE in hot weather conditions: Where personal protective equipment (PPE) is required it can cause heat stress due to its weight and the fact that it prevents sweat evaporating from the skin. In these situations employers should:

  • permit work to occur at a slower rate
  • rotate staff out of this environment on a more frequent basis
  • allow longer recovery times before permitting re-entry
  • provide facilities for PPE to be dried so that it can be worn again for re-entry
  • consider scheduling work to cooler times of the days
  • periodically revisit your risk assessment to consider if the process could be automated or alternative systems of work/controls can be introduced
  • re-evaluate your PPE as newer PPE may be lighter and provide improved levels of protection and operator comfort

Staff with a hormonal imbalance (menopause, thyroid or similar): Applying the control measures described on these webpages should be sufficient to ensure the welfare of those affected. While there’s no requirement on employees to disclose conditions that may affect thermal comfort, if an employee chooses to do so then it may be that the temporary measures described on these webpages could manage their thermal comfort.

Staff working outside in higher temperatures:

  • reschedule work to cooler times of the day
  • provide more frequent rest breaks and introduce shading to rest areas
  • provide free access to cool drinking water
  • introduce shading in areas where individuals are working
  • encourage the removal of personal protective equipment when resting to help encourage heat loss
  • educate workers about recognising the early symptoms of heat stress
Posted by Roger Hart